Comparative Evaluation of Heat Treatment of Guinea Fowl Meat
https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2022.i3.s150
Abstract
Introduction. The study of quality indicators of guinea fowl meat, depending on the methods of heat treatment, is of particular relevance in the context of increasing interest in ensuring effective health protection of the population and promoting the practices of the best available technologies.
Purpose. The purpose of the original study was to conduct a comparative assessment of changes in the quality of guinea fowl meat depending on various methods of heat treatment (baking, sous-vide).
Materials and methods. The work was guided by TR CU 021/2011, TR CU 034/2013, MG 4.2.2747-10, and all-Union State Standard.
Results. As a result of the research, it was found that guinea fowl meat is a source of complete protein (a lot of tryptophan and isoleucine), a balanced lipid fraction, which allows it to be recommended for therapeutic, functional children's and dietary nutrition. A sous-vide technology has been developed for a product made from guinea fowl meat with high functional and technological properties and organoleptic characteristics.
Conclusions. It has been established that the developed product contains 2.96% more moisture, 0.4% protein, has a more delicate texture and accessibility to the action of digestive enzymes (by 1.69%), compared with the product baked in a polyethylene terephthalate bag.
About the Authors
Elena V. Litvinova
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Kidyaev
МГУПП
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow State University of Food Production
Viktoria I. Lapshina
Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Nikitin
All-Russian Research Institute of the Refrigeration Industry - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "FNC of Food Systems named after V.M. Gorbatov" RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Agnelli, M.E., & Mascheroni, R.H. (2002). Quality evaluation of foodstuffs frozen in a cryomechanical freezer. Journal of Food Engineering, 52(3), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00113-3
2. Beltrán, J.A., & Bellés, M. (2019). Effect of Freezing on the Quality of Meat. In the Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability (Vol. 2, pp. 493–497). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Bertram, H. C., Andersen, R. H., & Andersen, H. J. (2007). Development in myofibrillar water distribution of two pork qualities during 10-month freezer storage. Meat Science, 75(1), 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.06.020
4. Birdseye, C. (1933). Preservation of perishable foods by new quick-freezing methods. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 215 (4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-0032(33)90043-5
5. Cassius, E.O. (2017). Long-term red meat preservation using chilled and frozen storage combinations: A review. Meat Science, 125, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.11.025
6. Damez, J. L., & Clerjon, S. (2008). Meat quality assessment using biophysical methods related to meat structure. Meat Science, 80(1), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.039
7. Damez, J.L., & Clerjon, S. (2013). Quantifying and predicting meat and meat products quality attributes using electromagnetic waves: An overview. Meat Science, 95(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.037
8. Diaz, P., Nieto, G., Garrido, M. D., & Banon, S. (2008). Microbial, physical–chemical and sensory spoilage dur ing the refrigerated storage of cooked pork loin processed by the sous-vide method. Meat Science, 80, 287–292.
9. Egelandsdal, B., Bjarnadottir, S., Mebre Abie, S., Zhu, H., Kolstad, H., Bjerke, F., Martinsen, Ø. G., Mason, A., & Münch, D. (2019). Detectability of the degree of freeze damage in meat depends on analytictool selection. Meat Science, 152, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.002
10. Farouk, M. M., Wieliczko, K. J., & Merts, I. (2004). Ultrafast freezing and low storage temperatures are not necessary to maintain the functional properties of manufacturing beef. Meat Science, 66(1), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00081-0
11. Fofanova, T.S. (2018). Sous vide technology - some aspects of quality and microbiological safety. Theory and Practice of Meat Processing, 3(1), 59-68.
12. George, R.M. (1993). Freezing proceseses used in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 4, 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(93)90032-6
13. Gordon, G.G., & Murray, A.C. (1991). Freezing Effects on Quality, Bacteriology and RetailCase Life of Pork. Food Science, 56(4), 891-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb14599.x
14. Gorlov, I.F., Pershina, E.I., & Tikhonov, S.L. (2013). Identification and prevention of the formation of meat with PSE and DFD properties and quality assurance for meat products from feedstocks exhibiting an anomalous autolysis behavior. Foods and Raw Materials, 1, 15–21.
15. Gurinovich, G.V., & Patrakova, I.S. (2013). Effect of wheat germ on the functional properties and oxidation stability of ground meat systems. Foods and Raw materials, 1, 3–10.
16. Hanenian, R., & Mittal G.S. (2004). Effect of freezing and thawing on meat quality. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2, 74–80.
17. Karmanova, A. E. (2017). Innovative technologies in catering. Innovative economy: prospects for development and improvement, 1 (19), 134-141.
18. Kim, H.-W., Kim, J.-H., Seo, J.-K., Setyabrata, D., & Brad Kim, Y. H. (2018). Effects of aging/freezing sequence and freezing rate on meat quality and oxidative stability of pork loins. Meat Science, 139, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.01.024
19. Koohmaraie, M. (1992). Effect of pH, temperature, and inhibitors on autolysis and catalytic activity of bovine skeletal muscle μ-calpain. Journal of Animal Science, 70(10), 3071-3080. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70103071x
20. Lepetit, J., Salé, P., & Dalle, R. (2002). Electrical impedance and tenderisation in bovine meat. Meat Science, 60(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00104-8
21. Ma, J. (2020). Prediction of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids of various processed pork meats using improved hyperspectral imaging technique. Food Chemistry, 321(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126695
22. Mason, L.H., Church, I.J., Ledward, D.A., & Parsons, A.L. (1990). The sensory quality of foods produced by conventional and enhanced cook‐chill methods. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 25(3), 247-259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01082.x
23. Mortensen, M., Andersen, H. J., Engelsen, S. B., & Bertram, H. С. (2006). Effect of freezing temperature, thawing and cooking rate on water distribution in two pork qualities. Meat Science, 72(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.05.027
24. Pearce, K. L., Rosenvold, К., Andersen, H. J., & Hopkins, D. L. (2011). Water distribution and mobility in meat during the conversion of muscle to meat and ageing and the impacts on fresh meat quality attributes - A review. Meat Science, 89(2), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.007
25. Pellissery, A. J, Vinayamohan, P. G., Amalaradjou, M. A. R., & Venkitanarayanan, K. (2020). Spoilage bacteria and meat quality. Meat Quality Analysis, 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819233-7.00017-3
26. Poznyakovskiya, V. M., Gorlovb, I. F., Tikhonovc, S. L., & Shelepov, V. G. (2015). About the quality of meat with PSE and DFD properties. Foods and Raw Materials, 3, 104-110.
27. Roldan, M., Antequera, T., Martin, A., Mayoral, A. I., & Ruiz, J. (2013). Effect of different temperature–time combinations on physicochemical, microbiological, textural and structural fea tures of sous-vide cooked lamb loins. Meat Science, 93, 572–578.
28. Ryu, Y. C., & Kim, B. C. (2006). Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. Journal of Animal Science, 84(4), 894-901. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844894x
29. Sales L.A., Mendes Rodrigues, L., Guimarães Silva, D. R., Fontes, P. R., de Almeida Torres Filho, R., de Lemos Souza Ramos, A., & Ramos, E. M. (2020). Effect of freezing/irradiation/thawing processes and subsequent aging on tenderness, color, and oxidative properties of beef. Meat Science, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108078
30. Sebranek, J. G., Sang, P. N., Topel, D. G., & Rust, R. E. (1979). Effects of Freezing Methods and Frozen Storage on Chemical Characteristics of Ground Beef Patties. Journal of Animal Science, 48(5), 1101-1108. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.4851101x
31. Jiang, S., Xue, D., Zhang, Z., Shan, K.; Ke, W., Zhang, M., Zhao, D., Nian, Y., Xu, X., Zhou, G., & Li, C. (2022). Effect of Sous-vide cooking on the quality and digestion characteristics of braised pork. Food Chemistry, 315, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131683.
32. Tan Y., Nookuea W., Li H., Thorin E., & Yan J. (2017). Cryogenic technology for biogas upgrading combined with carbon capture – a review of systems and property impacts. Energy Procedia, 142, 3741–3746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.270
33. Tarrant, P. V. (1989). The Effects of Handling, Transport, Slaughter and Chilling on Meat Quality and Yield in Pigs: A Review. Irish Journal of Food Science and Technology, 13(2), 79-10. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25619576
34. Tomovic, V. M. (2008). Effects of rapid chilling of carcasses and time of deboning on weight loss and technological quality of pork semimembranosus muscle. Meat Science, 80 (4), 1188-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.013
35. Xu, Z. (2019). The effect of freezing time on the quality of normal and pale, soft and exudative (PSE)-like pork. Meat Science, 152,1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.003
36. Xiong, Y. L. (2017). The Storage and Preservation of Meat: I−Thermal Technologies. Lawrie´s Meat Science, 8, 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100694-8.00007-8
Review
For citations:
Litvinova E.V., Kidyaev S.N., Lapshina V.I., Nikitin V.V. Comparative Evaluation of Heat Treatment of Guinea Fowl Meat. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2022;4(3):28-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2022.i3.s150
Views:
531
Email this article 