Scoping Review as a Genre of Scientific Communication
https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2020.i1.s284
Abstract
A scoping review as a tool for synthesizing scientific data is analyzed; the differences of a scoping review from a systematic review are given. The structure is described and recommendations for writing a scoping review are given.
About the Authors
M. G. BalykhinRussian Federation
Mikhail G. Balykhin
11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080
M. A. Kosycheva
Russian Federation
Marina A. Kosycheva
11 Volokolamskoe highway, Moscow, 125080
References
1. Raitskaya L. K., & Tikhonova E. V. (2019). Reviews as a promising kind of scholarly publication, its types and characteristics. Nauchnyi Redaktor i Izdatel’[Science Editor and Publisher], 4(3–4):131–139. https://doi.org/10.24069/2542-0267-2019-3-4-131-139
2. Raitskaya, L. K., & Tikhonova, E. V. (2020). An Overview of Reviews as a Trend Maker in the Field. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 29(3), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-37-57
3. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
4. Burgers C., Brugman B. C., & Boeynaems A. (2019). Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. Journal of Pragmatics, 145:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.004
5. Lavrusheva, O. (2020). The concept of vitality. Review of the vitality-related research domain. New Ideas in Psychology, 56, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100752
6. Raitskaya, L., & Tikhonova, E. (2019). Scoping Reviews: What is in a Name? Journal of Language and Education, 5(2), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9689
Review
For citations:
Balykhin M.G., Kosycheva M.A. Scoping Review as a Genre of Scientific Communication. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2020;2(1):7-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2020.i1.s284