Preview

Health, Food & Biotechnology

Advanced search

Pre-cancious penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern terminology according to the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs

https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2020.i4.s89

Abstract

Modern vision of pre-cancious penile intraepithelial neoplasia contained in the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs was studied. New approaches to systematization of pre-cancious epithelial tumors of penis were reviewed in the fifth chapter of the 2016 WHO Classification called «Tumours of the penis» in section Precursor lesions. In this chapter two nosological units such as penile intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV infection and differentiated penile intraepithelial neoplasia not associated with NPV were proposed. We analysed patients with papulosis bowenoid, leukoplakia, penile lichen sclerosus, pseudoepitheliomatous keratotic and micaceous balanitis in Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko in accordance with different histopathological types of penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV is identified in cases of papulosis bowenoid. Differential penile intraepithelial neoplasia can be found in clinical dignosis of leukoplakia, penile lichen sclerosus, pseudoepitheliomatous keratotic and micaceous balanitis.

About the Authors

Igor A. Lamotkin
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital; 3, Gospitalnaya square, Moscow, 105229, Russian Federation; Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation


Daniil I. Korabelnikov
Moscow Haass Medical and Social Institute
Russian Federation


Margarita D. Shibaeva
Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Moscow State University of Food Production
Russian Federation


Andrei I. Lamotkin
First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119992, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation


References

1. Lloyd KM. Multicentric pigmented Bowen's disease of the groin. Arch Dermatol. 1970;101:48-51.

2. Kopf AW, Bart RS. Tumor conference No. 11: multiple bowenoid papules of the penis: a new entity?. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1977; 3(3): 265-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1977.tb00289.x.

3. Shabbir M, Minhas S, Muneer A. Diagnosis and management of premalignant penile lesions. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3(3):151-8.

4. Obalek S, Jablonska S, Beaudenon S, Walczak L, Orth G. Bowenoid papulosis of the male and female genitalia: Risk of cervical neoplasia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986; 14: 433-444.

5. von Krogh G, Horenblas SN. Diagnosis and clinical presentation of premalignant lesions of the penis. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology 2000; 34: 201-221.

6. Dauendorffer JN, Cavelier Balloy B, Bagot M, Renaud-Vilmer C. Penile squamous hyperplasia. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2018;145(1):72-5.

7. Mikhall GR. Cancers, precancers, and pseudocancers on the male genitalia: A review of clinical appearances, histopathology, and management. J. Dermatol. Surg Oncol. 1980; 6: 1027-35.

8. Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Mirri F, et al. Penile carcinoma in patients with genital lichen sclerosus: A multicenter survey. J. Urol. 2006; 175: 1359-63.

9. Depasquale I., Park A.J., Bracka A. The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int. 2000; 86: 459-465.

10. Lortat-Jacob E, Civatte J. Micaceous and keratosic pseudo-epitheliomatous balanitis. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr 1961; 68:164-7.

11. Chaux A, Pfannl R, Rodríguez IM, Barreto JE, Velazquez EF, Lezcano C, et al. Distinctive immunohistochemical profile of penile intraepithelial lesions: A study of 74 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:553-62

12. Murthy PS, Kanak K, Raveendra L, Reddy P. Pseudoepitheliomatous, keratotic and micaceous balanitis. Indian J Dermatol. 2010; 55:190-1.

13. Adya KA, Palit A, Inamadar AC. Pseudoepitheliomatous keratotic and micaceous balanitis. Indian J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS. 2013; 34(2): 123-5. doi: 10.4103/0253-7184.120551.

14. Jenkins D Jr, Jakubovic HR. Pseudoepitheliomatous, keratotic and micaceous balanitis. A clinical lesion with two histologic subsets: Hyperplastic dystrophy and verrucous carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 18: 419-22.

15. Pai VV, Hanumanthayya K, Naveen KN, Rao R, Dinesh U. Pseudoepitheliomatous, keratotic and micaceous balanitis presenting as cutaneous horn in an adult male. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76:547-9.

16. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs . Edited by H. Moch, P. A. Humphrey, T.M. Ulbright, V.E. Reuter. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Lyon, 4th edition, 2016

17. Velazquez EF, Chaux A, Cubilla AL. Histologic classification of penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2012; 29:96-102.

18. Krustrup D, Jensen HL, van den Brule AJ, Frisch M. Histological characteristics of human papilloma-virus-positive and -negative invasive and in situ squamous cell tumours of the penis. Int J Exp Pathol. 2009;90(2):182-9.

19. Chaux A, Pfannl R, Lloveras B, Alejo M, Clavero O, Lezcano C, et al. Distinctive association of p16INK4a over-expression with penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) depicting warty and/or basaloid features: A study of 141 cases evaluating a new nomenclature. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010; 34: 385-392.

20. Chaux A, Velazquez EF, Amin A, el al. Distribution and characterization of subtypes of penile intraepilhelial neoplasia and their association with invasive carcinomas: a pathological study of 1 39 lesions in 121 patients. Hum Pathol. 2012; 43:1020-7.

21. Oertell J, Caballero C, Iglesias M, Chaux A. Amat L, Ayala E, et a. Differentiated precursor lesions and low-grade variants of squamous cell carcinomas are frequent findings in foreskins of patients from a region or high penile cancer incidence. Histopathology. 2011; 58:925-33.


Review

For citations:


Lamotkin I.A., Korabelnikov D.I., Shibaeva M.D., Lamotkin A.I. Pre-cancious penile intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern terminology according to the 2016 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2020;2(4):41-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36107/hfb.2020.i4.s89

Views: 686


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-7648 (Online)